September 2020

Dear Friends of Courage,

I am excited to tell you about some additions to the Courage website. We have added an “About Us and Our Mission” page that includes our mission and vision statements. We have also added a new page “Knowledge Base and Research Priorities”.

Our mission and vision statements articulate why Courage exists and how we, as an institution ourselves, envision a world where institutions act more courageously.

Mission
Courage exists to advance the world’s understanding of institutional courage and institutional betrayal through rigorous
scientific research, wide-reaching education, and data-driven action – with the goal to create more accountable, effective, and equitable institutions for everyone.

Vision
Our vision is to be the world’s foremost center for
scientific research, wide-reaching education, and data-driven action promoting institutional courage. Courage sees a future where our institutions act courageously: with accountability, with transparency, actively seeking justice, and making reparations where needed despite unpleasantness, risk, and short-term costs.

We have also further described our knowledge base and research priorities for Courage. Our knowledge base details the concepts and theories that guide the research and education activities of our institution. This content also serves an educational function for visitors to Courage’s website. The knowledge base sets the stage for our research priorities, which includes research questions that are top priorities for our Research Advisors and Research Associates. I hope you will visit Courage’s website to see this new content and I hope you share it widely.

Thank you for being with us on this journey, and with appreciation,

Jennifer Freyd
Founder and President, Center for Institutional Courage
September 2020


Spotlight: Institutional Betrayal in High School

In this issue, our spotlight is on institutional betrayal in high school in the context of gender harassment. Monika Lind and Alexis Adams-Clark, Courage Research Associates, discuss their new research article, “Isn’t high school bad enough already? Rates of gender harassment and institutional betrayal in high school and their association with trauma-related symptoms”.

Isn’t High School Bad Enough Already?
Monika Lind & Alexis Adams-Clark

Important work occurs in adolescence. In the midst of physical, neurological, and psychological changes, adolescents undertake the intertwined tasks of social learning and identity development. Adolescents must also develop future-oriented, goal-directed skills that allow them to assume adult roles. Adolescence is a sensitive period, second only to infancy in its plasticity and its potential for positive or negative inflection points. In many ways, high school is the “workplace” where the important work of adolescence occurs. Our study investigates whether gender harassment and institutional betrayal create a hostile work environment in high schools and interfere with healthy adolescent development.

Gender harassment is a type of sexual harassment characterized by sexist remarks, sexually crude or offensive behavior, and enforcement of traditional gender roles. Institutional betrayal is the failure of an institution, such as a school, to protect people who depend on the institution. In our study, we asked 535 college students to reflect on their experiences in high school and their current trauma-related symptoms, including mental, physical, and emotional challenges. From their responses, we learned that the more gender harassment and institutional betrayal teens encounter in high school, the more mental, physical, and emotional challenges they experience in college. In other words, our study suggests that gender harassment and institutional betrayal may hurt young people, and it is important that educators and researchers pay more attention to these issues.

Our study replicates three important findings. First, we found a high prevalence of gender harassment in high school. Second, we found the experience of sex-based harassment is associated with negative outcomes, which is well established in the literature. Third, we found that men reported experiencing less harassment than women, again mirroring a well-established pattern of results. Three of 535 participants had a non-binary gender identity, and we opted to exclude their data from the figure in order to avoid over-generalizing from a small sample.

Two innovative findings stand out as the most important contributions of this study. First, identifying the relationship between high school gender harassment and college trauma-related symptoms provides support for the continued investigation of gender harassment as an impediment to healthy adolescent development. This finding suggests that gender harassment merits increased attention in high schools. Second, high school institutional betrayal’s association with college trauma-related symptoms above and beyond gender, race, age, and gender harassment highlights the responsibility of schools to grapple with the potential harm caused by their indifference to harassment in their hallways. This finding extends the foundational research on institutional betrayal by focusing on gender harassment and institutional betrayal in adolescence.


Courage in Action: August - September 2020

Join Us and Support Courage

With your help, Courage can conduct groundbreaking scientific research and share what we learn with the world. Together, we can make institutional courage a reality. Courage is a 501(c)(3) exempt organization, and your donation is deductible within the limits set by the IRS.

The development and deployment of an institutional courage-based intervention represents the best next step for this line of research. Intervention research would allow us to test causal claims and protect students. Before anyone launches any interventions or policy changes, however, it’s important to emphasize that researchers and schools would benefit from first listening to students. We recommend that schools uphold the institutional courage principle of self-study by employing interviews, focus groups, and anonymous surveys of students, as well as taking students' reports and suggestions seriously. Interventions targeting adolescents work better when they demonstrate respect for teens' autonomy and social status. That starts with listening. The danger is that a half-baked attempt at fixing these issues could result in more institutional betrayal, not less. The hope is that institutional courage will help high schools live up to the incredible promise of this generation.