July 2022
Dear Friends of Courage,
Institutional betrayal and institutional courage can be enacted by many institutions upon which people are dependent, including of course schools, hospitals, religious organizations, and the military. The more tangible power the institution has over a person, the more profound the practical effects of the betrayal and courage. The more the individual trusts and feels attached to the institution, the more profound the psychological effects of the betrayal and courage.
Citizens often both trust and depend upon government agencies (such as the US Supreme Court). Therefore, governmental agencies can be profound sources of both practical and psychological betrayal and courage. Like many Americans, I am dismayed by some of the recent US Supreme Court decisions. My colleague Dr. Alec Smidt and I authored an editorial a few years ago about these types of governmental intrusions and lack of protection, terming them “government-mandated institutional betrayal.” Putting language to these governmental shortcomings is a first step to planning how to change them.
There is something else going on with the US Government that has received less press attention, but that is relevant to the mission of Courage. On June 23rd the US Department of Education released revised Title IX regulations, and just two weeks ago they were officially published in the Federal Register. While there are a number of positive changes in these proposed regulations, there is a deeply concerning one: Just about all college and university employees would be required to report any suspected sexual assault and sexual harassment even if the victim does not consent to a report being made. Furthermore, these regulations would require reporting about potential discrimination that an employee learned about second hand, such as from another student, family member, class assignment, social media, or Take Back the Night event. While on the surface mandatory reporting might seem like a good idea, research makes clear that it is not. I have compiled resources and written extensively on why mandatory reporting is both harmful to survivors and not effective at stopping sexual violence. The good news is that the proposed regulations are open for comment and change, and together perhaps we can prevent this new institutional betrayal from our government. Kathryn Holland, Elizabeth Armstrong, and I recently published an essay in The Chronicle of Higher Education explaining why the proposed mandatory reporting regulations would be neither effective nor safe. Some of my colleagues have created a resource page for how to submit a comment, including a template comment.
In closing, I invite you to read this issue’s Spotlight article by Courage Education Advisory Committee Chair Dr. Ross Cheit and researcher Sofia Boracci. Cheit and Boracci discuss Boracci’s project on the Child Sexual Abuse Survivor/Activist Archives, and describe how it relates to institutional courage.
Thank you for being with us on this journey, and with appreciation,
Jennifer Freyd
Founder and President, Center for Institutional Courage
July 2022
Spotlight: Archiving Activism and Courage in the 1990s
By Ross Cheit, JD, PhD, Courage Board Member and Education Advisory Committee Chair & Professor of Political Science, Brown University and
Sofia Boracci, Brown University
In this Spotlight article, Courage Board Member and Education Advisory Committee Chair Dr. Ross Cheit interviews Sofia Boracci, a researcher at Brown University. Boracci’s project focuses on the Child Sexual Abuse Survivor/Activist Archives, and here she describes how it relates to institutional courage.
Cheit: One of the wonderful things about teaching at Brown University is that I encounter, and occasionally support, some of the most interesting undergraduates. A remarkable example is Sofia Boracci, who became a research assistant on the website that I keep about recovered memories. Sofia had an academic interest in archives, and her work on my website resulted in a project that became part of her senior thesis. Can you explain that development?
Boracci: My project, the Child Sexual Abuse Survivor/Activist Archives, grew out of the recovered memory archive as a way of documenting histories of past activism that were at risk of becoming lost to time. As we researched 1990s newsletters about and by survivors of sexual violence to include on the website, we realized that it was difficult to find such newsletters, or any survivor-related materials from that time. While publications in journals can still be found in libraries or in online databases, even the most historically significant survivor-lead publications and evidence of activism from that time period are not easily accessible.
Cheit: What is the goal of this archive and how does your project relate to institutional courage?
Boracci: This archive aims to provide historical documentation of activist and professional work that sought to address the phenomenon and culture of sexual violence during the 1990s. I hope that the materials preserved in this archive will serve as a resource for research and education about historical activism to address sexual violence, allowing for individuals and institutions to seek truth and guidance from the past. This archive documents examples of ‘early courage’, key moments where people sought to hold their institutions accountable and educate their communities, often despite great personal struggle and risk. Many of these stories of early courage, though perhaps not well known, have had lasting impacts on institutional policy and culture that we still benefit from today. I hope that this archive will not only honor these legacies but allow them to become a source of empowerment.
Cheit: What do you think is an example of “early courage” documented by your archive?
Boracci: The work of David Calof, through his publication Treating Abuse Today, is one example of early courage that we are documenting in our archive. From 1991-1997, under Calof’s editorship, Treating Abuse Today published articles aimed at professionals treating trauma and abuse survivors. Despite threatening backlash and defamation from anti-therapy picketers and advocates, Calof continued his publication, advancing professional discourse and education around the treatment of trauma. Calof’s courage and tenacity in his work allowed for the betterment of the institution of therapy at large and serves as an example of how individuals can work to foster a culture of accountability, equity, and informed practice today.
Exceptional stories of early courage show that, while institutional courage was and is still too rare, it is possible. With continued research and education, we can work towards a future where these stories are more common than ever before.
Courage in Action: May - July 2022
Anne P. DePrince: Opinion: Violence against women is a key to understanding a wider array of problems
Anne P. DePrince: Reproductive coercion, post-Roe
Jennifer Freyd: Interview with Jennifer Freyd about DARVO, NBC Now
Jennifer Freyd: Who's Really the Victim Here? It's time to end DARVO behavior in the healthcare workplace
Jennifer M. Gómez: Epistemic Oppression, Construct Validity, and Scientific Rigor: Commentary on Woo et al. (2022)
Kathryn Holland, Jennifer Freyd, and Elizabeth Armstrong: Mandatory Reporting Is Exactly Not What Victims Need
Join Us and Support Courage
With your help, Courage can conduct groundbreaking scientific research and share what we learn with the world. Together, we can make institutional courage a reality. Courage is a 501(c)(3) exempt organization, and your donation is deductible within the limits set by the IRS.