October 2023 Courage in Action

In a recent op-ed for USA Today, Dr. Sarah Harsey and I delved into the harmful tactic of DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) utilized by former MSU football coach Mel Tucker amidst sexual harassment allegations. This tactic, commonly employed by sexual misconduct perpetrators, obstructs meaningful discussions on sexual violence, further victimizes the aggrieved, and protects the perpetrator. Our piece highlighted the perils of DARVO, emphasizing the critical need for awareness and education to lessen its use and impact.

First, on the nature of DARVO:

DARVO... [is] an acronym that stands for deny, attack, reverse victim and offender. Perpetrators of wrongdoing – especially those who commit sexual misconduct – often use it to deflect blame and responsibility.

Second, on the implications of Tucker's actions:

Whether Tucker is guilty or not guilty of what Tracy has alleged, DARVO itself is harmful. It promotes victim blaming and prevents thoughtful discussions of sexual violence from happening. DARVO is a venomous response that seeks to silence victims, confuse observers and empower perpetrators.

And third, what we know from our research about DARVO and how to stop it:

[DARVO] is a common tactic that can influence people’s perceptions in ways that favor perpetrators. People who are exposed to a perpetrator’s DARVO responses are more likely to find victims less credible and perpetrators less responsible for the wrongdoing they committed.

...That’s why it’s important to identify and name DARVO when it happens. Research tells us that DARVO is less likely to influence observers’ perceptions when they are educated about this tactic. In other words, knowing about DARVO renders it a less effective tool.

We aspire to cultivate a culture that rebukes such toxic behaviors, fostering accountability and backing for victims.

Jennifer Joy Freyd, PhD
Founder and President
Center for Institutional Courage